Myrtle Beach, SC, Orlando, FL and Washington, D.C. November 3, 2020—Thinking Outside the Boxe has released the transcripts of the question and answer session from its special Election Day Champagne Summit held on November 3, 2020. Participants included correspondents from Clermont, Florida; Dayton, Ohio; Owatonna, Minnesota; Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Prescott Valley, Arizona; Wheeling, West Virginia; Bismarck, North Dakota; Gastonia, North Carolina; and Sheffield, Jamaica.
The session examined the candidates’ pandemic records, mail-in and absentee voting procedures, law and order after the unrest of 2020, character and fitness, recovery and fiscal policy, the confirmation of Justice Barrett, declining trust in media and institutions, foreign policy toward China, Iran, and Russia, the winner’s first-year priorities, and structural problems in the primary, debate, and campaign-finance systems.
About Thinking Outside the Boxe
Thinking Outside the Boxe is a private, independent research and commentary organization dedicated to examining politics, finance, economics, world affairs, law, public policy, and the conduct of institutions from perspectives often absent from conventional media and public debate. Through original research, commentary, symposiums, and contributions from a diverse group of correspondents, Thinking Outside the Boxe seeks to broaden the parameters of public knowledge, challenge prevailing assumptions, and encourage thoughtful debate on issues of national and international importance.
Thinking Outside the Boxe is nonpartisan and independent of political parties, universities, media organizations, and institutional orthodoxies. Its work reflects a continuing commitment to limited government, lawful borders, fiscal seriousness, open inquiry, constitutional principles, and the belief that a free people are best served when arguments are tested against evidence rather than restricted to an approved range of opinion. Its correspondents may disagree with one another, but they share a willingness to examine difficult questions, reach conclusions, and say what conventional institutions sometimes will not.
