Myrtle Beach, SC, Orlando, FL and Washington, D.C. November 5, 2024—Thinking Outside the Boxe has released the transcripts of the question and answer session from its special Election Day Champagne Summit held on November 5, 2024. Participants included correspondents from Clermont, Florida; Wheeling, West Virginia; Bismarck, North Dakota; Gastonia, North Carolina; Owatonna, Minnesota; Prescott Valley, Arizona; Dayton, Ohio; Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Sydney, Australia; Orange County, California; and Sheffield, Jamaica.
The session addressed immigration and border security, inflation and the cost of living, the justice system and allegations of selective prosecution, character and fitness, the Middle East, Ukraine, and China, abortion policy after Dobbs, institutional trust, early voting and state election rules, the winner’s first-year agenda, and structural weaknesses in primaries, debates, campaign finance, and party institutions.
About Thinking Outside the Boxe
Thinking Outside the Boxe is a private, independent research and commentary organization dedicated to examining politics, finance, economics, world affairs, law, public policy, and the conduct of institutions from perspectives often absent from conventional media and public debate. Through original research, commentary, symposiums, and contributions from a diverse group of correspondents, Thinking Outside the Boxe seeks to broaden the parameters of public knowledge, challenge prevailing assumptions, and encourage thoughtful debate on issues of national and international importance.
Thinking Outside the Boxe is nonpartisan and independent of political parties, universities, media organizations, and institutional orthodoxies. Its work reflects a continuing commitment to limited government, lawful borders, fiscal seriousness, open inquiry, constitutional principles, and the belief that a free people are best served when arguments are tested against evidence rather than restricted to an approved range of opinion. Its correspondents may disagree with one another, but they share a willingness to examine difficult questions, reach conclusions, and say what conventional institutions sometimes will not.
